Ableton Live: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
this might be nonsense. delete as appropriate.
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 19: Line 19:
== Version History ==
== Version History ==
If you can count up to [[12]], you already know how much Ableton Live there is. One, two, three, ... you can do it, keep it up! Each number from the first one all the way up to [[12]] has it's own version of Ableton Live! That's a lot of versions so you know that whomsoever makes Ableton Live must be hard at work. They deserve a nice vacation, I think. They've done a good job.
If you can count up to [[12]], you already know how much Ableton Live there is. One, two, three, ... you can do it, keep it up! Each number from the first one all the way up to [[12]] has it's own version of Ableton Live! That's a lot of versions so you know that whomsoever makes Ableton Live must be hard at work. They deserve a nice vacation, I think. They've done a good job.
Even if you get the latest one, the newer versions appear without you noticing, like the things we see by our beds in the dead of night, more akin to a strand of being than any earthly form. Likewise, Live's progression through time appears to be linear, with each increasing numbered version coming after the previous. This is in contrast to famed time-travelling audio application Logic, which seems to come fron the distant past. Only two layers of grouping? Hah! Losers. And you know I'm right, because I've written my opinion on a wiki.
The newer versions of Live add some very fancy-looking things, but there are probably plugins that you can get for free that do the same stuff. Hey, why make nice-sounding music at all? Change it up! Make aesthetically abysmal tunes. The bes thing is, you can use any version of Live to do this.


== Alternatives ==
== Alternatives ==