Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
vaguely proud of this |
WangleLine (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== How work == | == How work == | ||
In a blatant act of plagiarism, Wikipedia's structure is copied almost entirely from that of '''pronounmail the wiki''', in that anyone can edit a page. However, these hapless cretins require edits to be " | In a blatant act of plagiarism, Wikipedia's structure is copied almost entirely from that of '''pronounmail the wiki''', in that anyone can edit a page. However, these hapless cretins require edits to be "rEVieWeD" in many cases, destroying all opportunities for joy or whimsy such as those which often occur in our wondrous realm. | ||
== Why == | == Why == | ||
Some people want to put true things on the internet without being funny. This is unacceptable. These people disgrace the true purpose of the internet.<ref>(also on the rare occasion they do try being funny it ends up as some form of obtuse, overly referential, early 2000s nerd humour. idk if that's a helpful description, but i don't know how else to describe it at all. it's worth at least a journal's worth of study all to itself honestly.)</ref> | Some people want to put true things on the internet without being funny. This is unacceptable. These people disgrace the true purpose of the internet.<ref>(also on the rare occasion they do try being funny it ends up as some form of obtuse, overly referential, hyper-self-indulgent, early 2000s nerd humour. idk if that's a helpful description, but i don't know how else to describe it at all. it's worth at least a journal's worth of study all to itself honestly.)</ref> | ||
== What is the true purpose of the Internet == | == What is the true purpose of the Internet == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== What can be done == | == What can be done == | ||
'''pronounmail the wiki''' at present has no plan of action against the threat to fun posed by the tedious bureaucrats at Wikipedia... | '''pronounmail the wiki''' at present has no plan of action against the threat to [[fun]] posed by the tedious bureaucrats at Wikipedia... | ||
...is the official line. As we speak, tactical nya-bombs, omnisauce gas, and humorously-named neurotoxins are being prepared, overseen by our esteemed colleague and inventor of weapons, John Weapons. In the coming days, these will be unleashed on the ever-so-well-kept world of the Wikipedians, decimating their virtual infrastructure | ...is the official line. As we speak, tactical nya-bombs, [[Sauce|omnisauce]] gas, and humorously-named neurotoxins are being prepared, overseen by our esteemed colleague and inventor of weapons, John Weapons. In the coming days, these will be unleashed on the ever-so-well-kept world of the Wikipedians, decimating their virtual infrastructure and leaving only '''pronounmail the wiki''' as the final arbiters of truth on the Internet. Their war on error ends here. | ||
== What has been said == | == What has been said == | ||
{{quote|Sir, a second unreviewed edit has hit the page.| | {{quote|Sir, a second unreviewed edit has hit the page.|george bussy}} | ||
== Controversies? == | == Controversies? == | ||
They consider "controversies" sections to be hackneyed and boring. They're probably right. Counterpoint: fuck you. | They consider "controversies" sections to be hackneyed and boring. They're probably right. Counterpoint: fuck you. | ||
== | == Are there any notes == | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||