Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
WangleLine (talk | contribs) m linky |
WangleLine (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Wikipedia 88x31 anim.gif|thumb|This 8831 is kinda cool though. [[Respect]].]] | [[File:Wikipedia 88x31 anim.gif|thumb|This 8831 is kinda cool though. [[Respect]].]] | ||
'''Wikipedia''' is the [[pronounmail the wiki]] for Losers. It's written by normal people with way less [[swag]] than us aura lobsters here at pronouns mail the wiky | '''Wikipedia''' is the [[pronounmail the wiki]] for Losers. It's written by normal people with way less [[swag]] than us aura lobsters here at pronouns mail the wiky | ||
== How work == | |||
In a blatant act of plagiarism, Wikipedia's structure is copied almost entirely from that of '''pronounmail the wiki''', in that anyone can edit a page. However, these hapless cretins require edits to be "rEVieWeD" in many cases, destroying all opportunities for joy or whimsy such as those which often occur in our wondrous realm. | |||
== Why == | |||
Some people want to put true things on the internet without being funny. This is unacceptable. These people disgrace the true purpose of the internet.<ref>(also on the rare occasion they do try being funny it ends up as some form of obtuse, overly referential, hyper-self-indulgent, early 2000s nerd humour. idk if that's a helpful description, but i don't know how else to describe it at all. it's worth at least a journal's worth of study all to itself honestly.)</ref> | |||
== What is the true purpose of the Internet == | |||
meow :3 | |||
== What can be done == | |||
'''pronounmail the wiki''' at present has no plan of action against the threat to [[fun]] posed by the tedious bureaucrats at Wikipedia... | |||
...is the official line. As we speak, tactical nya-bombs, [[Sauce|omnisauce]] gas, and humorously-named neurotoxins are being prepared, overseen by our esteemed colleague and inventor of weapons, John Weapons. In the coming days, these will be unleashed on the ever-so-well-kept world of the Wikipedians, decimating their virtual infrastructure and leaving only '''pronounmail the wiki''' as the final arbiters of truth on the Internet. Their war on error ends here. | |||
== What has been said == | |||
{{quote|Sir, a second unreviewed edit has hit the page.|george bussy}} | |||
== Controversies? == | |||
They consider "controversies" sections to be hackneyed and boring. They're probably right. Counterpoint: fuck you. | |||
== Are there any notes == | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:51, 28 October 2025
Wikipedia is the pronounmail the wiki for Losers. It's written by normal people with way less swag than us aura lobsters here at pronouns mail the wiky
How work
In a blatant act of plagiarism, Wikipedia's structure is copied almost entirely from that of pronounmail the wiki, in that anyone can edit a page. However, these hapless cretins require edits to be "rEVieWeD" in many cases, destroying all opportunities for joy or whimsy such as those which often occur in our wondrous realm.
Why
Some people want to put true things on the internet without being funny. This is unacceptable. These people disgrace the true purpose of the internet.[1]
What is the true purpose of the Internet
meow :3
What can be done
pronounmail the wiki at present has no plan of action against the threat to fun posed by the tedious bureaucrats at Wikipedia...
...is the official line. As we speak, tactical nya-bombs, omnisauce gas, and humorously-named neurotoxins are being prepared, overseen by our esteemed colleague and inventor of weapons, John Weapons. In the coming days, these will be unleashed on the ever-so-well-kept world of the Wikipedians, decimating their virtual infrastructure and leaving only pronounmail the wiki as the final arbiters of truth on the Internet. Their war on error ends here.
What has been said
Sir, a second unreviewed edit has hit the page.
— george bussy
Controversies?
They consider "controversies" sections to be hackneyed and boring. They're probably right. Counterpoint: fuck you.
Are there any notes
| This is a stubbbbbbbb. |
- ↑ (also on the rare occasion they do try being funny it ends up as some form of obtuse, overly referential, hyper-self-indulgent, early 2000s nerd humour. idk if that's a helpful description, but i don't know how else to describe it at all. it's worth at least a journal's worth of study all to itself honestly.)