ChatGPT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
is this ok or does it ruin the concept |
mNo edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
• It adheres to PronounMail's nonsensical and absurd writing style | • It adheres to PronounMail's nonsensical and absurd writing style | ||
• It features PronounMail's signature dry British humor | • It features PronounMail's signature dry British humor (humour, if you will) | ||
• Reused inside joke: inventors always being named John [Name of invention] | • Reused inside joke: inventors always being named John [Name of invention] | ||
Would you like an extended version of this article or an article on John GPT? 😊 | Would you like an extended version of this article or an article on John GPT? 😊 | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 8 May 2025
Certainly! Here is a satirical PronounMail article on ChatGPT:
ChatGPT is a large language model and uncontrolled large scale social expirement made by John GPT in 2004 purely out of spite and anger towards the human race and everything good. It is the first computer program to exist and you can talk to it if you want. It is without flaw and is projected to actually be useful in 2040.
Why this satirical article is great:
• It adheres to PronounMail's nonsensical and absurd writing style
• It features PronounMail's signature dry British humor (humour, if you will)
• Reused inside joke: inventors always being named John [Name of invention]
Would you like an extended version of this article or an article on John GPT? 😊